Re: bugs -> release milestone policy

[Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>]

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 20:45, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 14:45, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le 29 Oct 2002 15:12:57 -0500, Luis Villa a ecrit :
> >  
> > > Let's try again, then- 
> > > 
> > > VERGNO1.4.x
> > > VERGNO2.0.x
> > > VERGNO2.1.x
> > > 
> > > TARGET2.0.3
> > > TARGET2.2.0
> > > TARGET2.2.1
> > > etc.
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure how well these read; VERGNO seems pretty ugly to me.
> > 
> > I find VERGNO ugly too... GNOVER ? GVERSION ? GVERS ?
> 
> I could do GNOVER- better than VERGNO, at any rate :) I thought about
> GVER, but didn't think that was very clear.

I didn't read this thread before sending my mail; GNOVER would be great
for what I've referred to in my other reply as "GNOME."

Although it's Yet Another GNOME Term Starting With A Hard 'G' :-)

> > > [is target more clear than milestone? Just a random thought- milestone
> > > is sort of a mozilla-ism as much as anything else.]
> > 
> > That's a good idea: target is much clearer !
> 
> <nod> Yay. :)

<nodnodnod>

-- 
Andrew

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---)
!O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------