Re: fyi for closing bounced needinfo bugs

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

cc'ing bugsquad so that they see this. [Presumably FIXED INVALID for
non-gimp bugs would also be relevant to gimp's stats.] Also, note that
this probably isn't a good idea for most components- the extra spam
probably outweighs the damage to our meager stat-keeping.]
Luis

On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 15:35, Dave Fallon wrote:
> A heads up for others (kmaraas?) who are closing the bouncers:
> 
>  ------- Additional Comments From davef tetsubo com  2002-10-24 18:17 -------
>  Email to the user is bouncing, so you're never going to get feedback
>  (or at least, odds are significantly against it). Thus, closing.
>  Please reopen if you disagree.
> +
> +------- Additional Comments From quinet gamers org  2002-10-25 05:11 -------
> +It is better to first mark the bug as FIXED INCOMPLETE and then CLOSED
> +instead of marking it as CLOSED immediately.  This allows the closed
> +bug report to have a resolution (such as invalid or incomplete) instead
> +of being closed without any resolution.  This is a detail, but I prefer
> +to keep these stats as accurate as possible.  This will help me later if
> +I try to generate a summary of the bugs that have been fixed for the
> +next major release.
> 
> This in particular is for the gimp product.
> 
> dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bugzilla-maintainers mailing list
> bugzilla-maintainers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-maintainers
>