Re: GNOMEVER2.3?

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 14:24, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le 18 Nov 2002 14:00:34 -0500, Luis Villa a ecrit :
> 
> > I was going through the list of versioned-but-not-bugsquaded bugs[1]
> > and realized there are a lot of enhancements marked 2.0, which clearly
> > is not correct ;) and 2.1 isn't _really_ correct either at this point.
> > I know someone requested a 2.3 TARGET a while back, and I (stupidly)
> > more or less ignored it. Consider this an apology :) Should I add it
> > now? anyone object?
> > Luis
> 
> No objection here. It will definitely be useful. Will it be TARGET2.3.0
> or TARGET2.3.x or TARGET2.4.0 ? I vote for TARGET2.4.0 :)

I was thinking features (which is mostly what I'm looking at today)
should be TARGET2.3.0; bugs should be TARGET2.4.0- thoughts?

Luis