Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: moving to GNOME bugzilla (was Potential Nautilus categories for GNOME bugzilla)

[Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>]

On Wednesday, July 25, 2001, at 09:45  PM, Jon Allen wrote:

> If you're willing to help with reorganization later (after the
> move) I'd be happy to move them now.  I agree that getting the
> bugs moved is more important than fine-tuning the organization.
> So, should we create b.g.o products/categories/versions that match
> the current Eazel bugzilla?

I'd like to do that soon. The only downside is that we'll start getting 
bug reports over there, but in the interest of getting the move done as 
soon as possible, yes, I think we should do it as soon as possible.

> Thanks for the clarification.  So, do we want to transfer the
> attachments or not?

I'd like to transfer attachments. That's why I listed the tasks needed to 
accomplish that in my list of things to do.

> If contributors wish to own specific categories and receive
> mail for them that should be possible.  The mailing list should
> own all other components.  I assume we need to create a
> nautilus-bugs-list gnome org?

Yes, that's what I'd prefer. It's true that are other already-existing 
lists we can use, but I was hoping to create an opt-in list called 
something like that, rather than using an existing "maintainers list". 
Then we can set the default owner for eel and nautilus to that list rather 
than setting the default owner to an individual. People can subscribe to 
the list if they want to see the bug activity. I assume that's how the 
gtk-bugs list works.

[My apologies for all the cross-posting in this thread.]

    -- Darin