Re: How should at-spi be turned on?
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: merchan phys lsu edu
- Cc: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>, merchan baton phys lsu edu, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: How should at-spi be turned on?
- Date: 01 May 2003 06:02:02 +0100
On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 16:48, Gregory Merchan wrote:
> But my reason for playing with at-poke may be a reason to always load the
> modules. Last time I saw platform-wide GUI scripting discussed, use of AT
> was suggested as the way to do this. Using AT would should solve at least
> two problems "GNOMEScript" would have. As it's in the libraries and
> should already provide complete functional coverage, there's no need for
> extra work to support scripting. (AppleScript had this problem, afaik.)
> Because AT should be working regardless of where the X clients are running,
> there's no need for another rendevous layer like ICE's.
IMHO; the accessibility code being 'always on' will have a very
significant performance impact; and is not really the right way to go
about setting up a general scripting infrastructure - although, clearly,
there are many useful ideas / implementations in there.
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[Date Prev][Date Next
] [Thread Prev][Thread Next