Re: AM_DISABLE_STATIC in ATK
- From: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>
- To: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org, otaylor redhat com
- Subject: Re: AM_DISABLE_STATIC in ATK
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:25:23 +0100 (BST)
Owen,
My personal belief is that static libraries are evil and should be discouraged,
or, at least, belong to another age.
As Bill has pointed out, running autogen.sh with --enable-static will allow a
static library to be created.
Is this acceptable, or should all projects have the same default action with
respect to creating static libraries?
Padraig
> Delivered-To: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> To: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> Subject: AM_DISABLE_STATIC in ATK
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-BeenThere: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> X-Loop: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
> List-Id: GNOME accessibility development <gnome-accessibility-list.gnome.org>
>
>
> Is there a reason why this is in ATK's configure.in?
>
> While I generally specify --disable-static on my configure
> line, we definitely want it to be possible to build a
> stand-along application that statically links with GTK+ and
> all its dependencies.
>
> Regards,
> Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]