Re: AtkState
- From: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>
- To: Bill Haneman Sun COM
- Cc: otaylor redhat com, hp redhat com, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: AtkState
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:37:59 +0100 (BST)
> Delivered-To: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: AtkState
> To: timj gtk org, Padraig Obriain Sun COM
> Cc: otaylor redhat com, hp redhat com, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-MD5: y7dgIavekhM9IfF4pxpkIg==
> X-BeenThere: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> X-Loop: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
> List-Id: GNOME accessibility development <gnome-accessibility-list.gnome.org>
>
>
> >> ok, i can't say i understand your "states" enough to judge whether
> exporting
> >> the flags into a flyweight interface is a good idea. but in any case,
> since
> >> with the new approach you return a new object, you prolly meant to
> write:
> >>
> >> AtkStateSet* atk_object_ref_state_set (AtkObject *accesible);
> >>
> >> right?
> >>
> >
> >Right, thanks.
> >
> >Padraig
>
>
> Padraig:
>
> I thought our new implementation returned a persistent object?
> (Since state needs to persist, and we don't expose the internals of the
> object)
>
This was not what I intended.
Padraig
> Thus "get" ?
>
> -Bill
>
> ------
> Bill Haneman x19279
> Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
> Sun Microsystems Ireland
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]