Re: ATK tarball and GTK+ diff tarball

>>  * Memory management for AtkRelation/AtkRelationSet obviously
>>    needs some thinking through. Does AtkRelation hold strong
>>    references on the target? 
>>    AtkRelation/AtkRelationSet either need to be value objects
>>    that can be copied, or they need to be GObjects, These
>>    are basically the only memory management models that work
>>    for language bindings.
>By strong references, do you mean that g_object_ref() has been called on the 
>AtkObjects in the target? If so, the answer is no.

FYI, we are re-thinking this, probably we will ref the AtkObjects that are in 
a RelationSet.  This will likely be a part of the overall overhaul (pardon the 
phrase) of AtkRelationSet that Padraig is doing at the moment.


Bill Haneman x19279
Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
Sun Microsystems Ireland 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]