Re: [g-a-devel]AccessibleKeystrokeListener and keys logging
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: gnome-accessibility-devel bernard-hugueney org
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]AccessibleKeystrokeListener and keys logging
- Date: 04 Sep 2003 18:23:21 +0100
Hi Bernard:
Glad you got this worked out; I was wondering if this might be your
problem but I was away from email.
I am surprised to find that this is not documented in the at-spi/cspi
docs, I agree that it should be.
- Bill
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 18:40,
gnome-accessibility-devel bernard-hugueney org wrote:
> Le Mardi 26 Août 2003 15:19, Bill Haneman a écrit :
> > Hi Bernard:
> >
> > You said, regarding KEYLISTENER sync types:
> > > NOSYNC allows me to register my listeners, but I then steal the
> > > event (I only want to log it and let the app consume it
> > > afterwards)
> >
> > I am not sure I understand what you mean; if you aren't "consuming"
> > the event, only snooping it, NOSYNC is probably what you want. If
> > you believe that the events are being consumed even though you have
> > not specified CANCONSUME in your flags, then that would be a bug.
> > What exactly did you mean by your comment? Perhaps we are
> > misunderstanding each other here.
> >
>
> I opened and closed a bug on this. Turned out it was related to the
> return value of the AccessibleKeystrokeListenerCB and not CANCONSUME
> .
>
> Lack of documentation prevents me from telling if it really was a bug
> or not.
> returning true consumed the keystroke events (except with OpenOffice).
>
> I'm sending this to the list so that this piece of knowledge is made
> public, because I couldn't find anything anywhere.
>
> HTH.
>
> Bernard
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]