RE: [g-a-devel]Proposed implementation agnostic GNOME Speech API.
- From: "Mike Pedersen" <mike pedersen sbcglobal net>
- To: "'Peter Korn'" <Peter Korn Sun COM>, <n7zib bresnan net>
- Cc: <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>, "'Rich Burridge'" <Rich Burridge Sun COM>
- Subject: RE: [g-a-devel]Proposed implementation agnostic GNOME Speech API.
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:01:27 -0800
Hi Peter, if these are going to be uploaded and made generally available I'd
like to suggest that it be in html as opposed to PDF. I don't know how most
blind people feel but for me PDF is pretty low on my list of favorite
document formats.
Thoughts?
regards
Mike Pedersen
-----Original Message-----
From: gnome-accessibility-devel-admin gnome org
[mailto:gnome-accessibility-devel-admin gnome org] On Behalf Of Peter Korn
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:55 PM
To: n7zib bresnan net
Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org; Rich Burridge
Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]Proposed implementation agnostic GNOME Speech API.
Hi Scott,
Limiting distribution to gnome-accessibility-devel given the attachments.
Please find two PDF documents, each one is a single page containing a cheat
sheet for 4 of the Gnopernicus layers.
Remus - do ya think we could put these on www.baum.ro/gnopernicus.html
somewhere?
Regards,
Peter Korn
Sun Accessibility team
Scott Berry wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Yeah that would be great if you could pass along your cheat sheet
> please. Also what software is Gnopernicus working with right now? I
> notice Mozilla isn't one of them.On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Peter Korn
> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Scott,
>>
>>Scott Berry wrote:
>>
>>>I also have a question here. Why is it that Gnopernicus uses such a
>>>complicated layer of keys. Being new to the program it makes it
>>>quite difficult to use. I wonder if this could be changed?
>>
>>Gnopernicus is in many ways three different apps; or rather, it
>>supports three different output modalities of which any two (or
>>perhaps just a single
>>one) might be of use to any given individual: e.g. speech + Braille, or
>>magnification + speech.
>>
>>As there are so many commands that a user might want to issue
>>immediately to change things (e.g. speech rate, magnification size),
>>Gnopernicus would group related commands together on the keypad. In
>>this way a speech user might live on keypad layer 8 for much of the
>>time, a magnification user on layer #1 or #2.
>>
>>The alternatives are:
>>
>> 1. have far fewer commands available by default
>> 2. use Ctrl/Shift/Alt-keypad combinations instead of layers 3. use
>> Function keys or them main keyboard with Ctrl/Shift/Alt combinations
>>
>>Of these, I think really only option #2 is worth considering.
>>
>>
>>I do think it would be very helpful to have better documentation of
>>the keypad keys. I've cribbed up a cheat sheet for myself (a horribly
>>inaccessable PDF document), that also is also out of date. I'd be
>>happy to share it, though being in graphical and basically inaccesible
>>document, it wouldn't be of particular use to the core audience of
>>this software.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Peter Korn
>>Sun Accessibility team
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, 12 Dec 2003,
>>>Rich Burridge wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>Marc Mulcahy asked my to announce something I've been working on
>>>>over the last few weeks, and get feedback from the community on.
>>>>
>>>>I've filed bug #129205
>>>>
>>>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129205
>>>>
>>>>to capture this work.
>>>>
>>>>In short, I've created an implementation agnostic set of wrappers
>>>>for the existing GNOME Speech v0.2.X API that used GObject. It hides
>>>>the existing Bonobo/ORBit2 implementation under the covers.
>>>>
>>>>There is a test application included in one of the two attachments
>>>>to the bug.
>>>>
>>>>If accepted, it's planned that the Bonobo/ORBit2 API would continue
>>>>to be provided (but deprecated).
>>>>
>>>>I've also rewritten the speech related code in gnopernicus to use
>>>>this new API, but I haven't attached that work yet, until the
>>>>community feel that this is a good thing to do.
>>>>
>>>>I know the API/ABI freeze for GNOME 2.5/6 has already happened, so
>>>>this is something we'd like to consider for GNOME 2.7/8.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
>>>>Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
>>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
>>>Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]