Re: [g-a-devel]active-descendant-changed signal and at-spi



The only interesting thing in the active-descendant-changed signal is the object 
which is the new active descendant.

Do I need to call BONOBO_OBJECT_REF (spi_accessible_new()) on it and stick it 
into the any_data field?

Padraig

> Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]active-descendant-changed signal and at-spi
> To: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>
> Cc: accessibility mailing list <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Hi Padraig,
> 
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 11:48, Padraig O'Briain wrote:
> > I am trying to figure out what needs to change in at-spi to support 
> > active-descendant-changed signal.
> > 
> > It looks like a signal handler for it needs to be added to the bridge.
> 
> 	Quite.
> 
> > What should happen when the signal is emitted?
> 
> 	You get to make up some string name for it; ram whatever detail you
> think is useful into the event structure; and do an emitv of some sort
> in the handler.
> 
> 	HTH,
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]