Re: [g-a-devel]Re: at-spi callbacks

["Draghi Puterity" <mp baum de>]

Hi Michael,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Meeks" <michael ximian com>
To: "Draghi Puterity" <mp baum de>
Cc: "David Bolter" <david bolter utoronto ca>; "Bill Haneman"
<bill haneman sun com>; "accessibility mailing list"
<gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]Re: at-spi callbacks


> Hi Draghi,
>
> On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 16:31, Draghi Puterity wrote:
> > why don't you use a queue for the SPI events? After you are done with
> > processing one event, just get the next one from the queue, process it
and
> > repeat this steps until the queue is empty. Do you see any drawbacks
with
> > this approach?
>
> I have a pending proposal to make this a lot easier to handle in the
> next version of ORBit2 - by allowing some incoming CORBA methods to be
> delayed until idle.
>

As long as this is not introducing an inacceptable latency it sounds
interesting. I'm keen to test is when it will become available.

> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
>  mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>