[g-a-devel]Re: An at-spi suggestion

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

Bill Haneman wrote:
> 
Apologies for erplying to myself, but I think I should clarify:

I said:

> There is some code/idl in at-spi at the moment which we are not
> installing 

and then said...

> Strictly speaking, removing an installed binary is API change, so this
> would need to be
> approved...

So, what I mean is, we are not installing the IDL now but we are 
installing a binary that implements it.  I am proposing that we
move both the (presently uninstalled) IDL and headers, and the
(presently installed) binary.

What do you think?

-Bill

> -Bill
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers