Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu> writes:
> On 19 Sep 2001 14:30:30 -0400, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 15:11, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2001-09-18 at 09:20, Bill Gribble wrote:
> > > > This is an ignorant question, I'm sure (haven't paid too much attention
> > > > to gnome-2.0 issues) but why isn't libgal on the gnome-2.0 list? 
> > > 
> > > libgal hasn't been ported to the 2.0 platform yet.
> > 
> >   ...And will not be in the near future anyways.
> > 
> 
> What will this do to application developers who need to port to GNOME2 &
> have used libgal? I understand that you guys don't want to maintain a
> fork of libgal, and that work is in earnest right now to make Evo 1.0
> happen so you don't want extra complication...but...
> 

Isn't it amazing how if you use an unsupported library you end up
... without support! ;-)

Shocking but true.

Havoc