Re: GNOME 2.0 Platform Alpha Deadline - Sep 26, 2001

[decreased cc: list length]

On 19 Sep 2001, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:

> > If the license terms aren't acceptable, that's perfectly understandable,
>   BTW, just FYI, we are changing the GAL licensing into LGPL.


This is good news.

>   Although, I do agree that GAL shouldn't be part of the 2.0 platform,
> for the various reasons people have been pointing out.

Ok, so can we drop this part of the discussion and move on?

> -- 
> Ettore


I haven't been vampired. You've been Weatherwaxed.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]