Re: GnomeFontSelector
- From: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>, gnome-2-0 <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GnomeFontSelector
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 10:27:06 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Sander Vesik wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Bill Haneman wrote:
> >
> > > Havoc: remind me again of why libzvt is not good enough? I know it does
> > > not support UTF-8, but are there other big issues with it?
> > >
> > > Since it's been ported to GTK+-2 and is already modular I think it would
> > > likely be an easier target for accessibility, based on a quick
> > > examination, unless it is really fundamentally insufficient for other
> > > reasons... at least for 2.0.
> > >
> >
> > I see two conflicting threads here:
> > a) we want the terminal to be acessible to people who need to work
> > in an environment that requires i18n, inc. non-latin-x
> > b) we want the terminal to be acceible to people who can't access
> > non-accessible (as in 'lacks acessability technology support')
> > terminals
>
> I don't see these threads as conflicting, just complementary.
>
But the optimal and easiest way of getting there is - in case a) you want
to start librarifing xterm in case b) you want to start with libzvt.
Just look at what you and Havoc have been saying 8-)
> - Bill
>
Sander
I haven't been vampired. You've been Weatherwaxed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]