Re: Panel Accessibility (long, but please read) [was Re: Panel Status - GNOME 2.0]

[ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Bill Haneman wrote:

> You have already raised the spectre of a Gnome 2 without a panel (or one
> that "doesn't work") - or was that just a rhetorical device?

reality check: a lot of us don't consider a panel not fully "accessable"
"broken" or "not working".

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
A radioaktív macskáknak tizennyolc fél-élete van