Re: GDM branched for GNOME 2.0 (GDM 2.4)
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- To: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>
- Cc: Francisco Petrucio Cavalcante Junior <fpcj impa br>, "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp mkp net>, George <jirka 5z com>, Gnome 2 List <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>, <gdm sunsite dk>
- Subject: Re: GDM branched for GNOME 2.0 (GDM 2.4)
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 01:39:38 +0800 (HKT)
On 7 Nov 2001, Carlos [ISO-8859-1] Perell?Mar璯 wrote:
> > > Carlos> Then, gdm3 is dead?
> > >
> > > Was it ever alive*?
> >
> > So, why does it exist a gdm3 in the unstable status report?
>
> Because I didn't know that is dead. The new ones don't have it but gdm2.
> Sorry.
And is it ok to declare so by adding "THIS_MODULE_IS_X" to gdm3
repository?
Abel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
