Re: RFC: GnomeMDI
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: George <jirka 5z com>
- Cc: gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RFC: GnomeMDI
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:24:23 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, George wrote:
> > I tought the compat cruft is to stay only until the next major release.
> > I.e. you will have the timeframe from GNOME2 to GNOME3 to migrate
> > completely from depracated GNOME1 stuff since they will disappear
> > completely in GNOME3.
> > Otherwise, we will have compat stuff 10 times the size of actual content
> > for GNOME8.
>
> That's the price of being compatible, and we should be so. GnomeMDI is
> actually quite useful too.
This, of course, is not about MDI specifically.
> Remember that larger companies are a few versions behind in everything, so
> you can't expect them to be always up to date.
I still think we need a 100% complete deprecation schedule.
Free software has traditionally been very fast on adapting to new APIs
(just witness how many programs depended on various
incompatible versions of libgtk1.1-* before gtk+ 1.2 on Debian, driving
maintainers crazy:), so the time frame from 2.0 to 3.0 should be more than
enough for those to leave deprecated stuff.
And I can't really care for closed-source proprietary applications (I
don't know if there is a single closed-source app out there that uses
GNOME).
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Írj be egy tetszôleges 12 jegyű prímszámot a folytatáshoz!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]