Re: building gnome 2.0 (fwd)
- From: Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>
- To: Ravi Pratap M <ravi che iitm ac in>
- Cc: "Gnome 2.0 List" <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: building gnome 2.0 (fwd)
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:12:29 -0700
Ravi Pratap M wrote:
>
> Well, I fixed the problem (although in a hackish manner) by
> installing autoconf, automake etc into the same prefix too. Until autoconf
> becomes less broken, a parallel install in the same prefix and using the
> same aclocal might not be possible.
>
> Of course, you could change the names of the macros but that is
> probably not the way to go.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ravi
>
The biggest advantage of this approach, the "build EVERYTHING in a new
prefix approach" is that you never have to second-guess your build about
prefix issues. You know for a fact that autoconf, automake, libtool,
gettext and pkg-config all have the same unique prefix.
I think the savings in time debugging prefix issues are worth the extra
bit of disk space you use, so I dont consider this so much a hack, but
rather a good way to deal with the insanity.
-re
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]