Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config

From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:29:56 +0200 (CEST)

On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Dietmar Maurer wrote:

> 1.) Which client side API should we use, either:
> 
>         - GConf client API or
> 
>         - The bonobo API (PropertyBag/EventSource/Monikers)

If bonobo-conf uses GConf on the backside, I would hope end-developers
can choose between the GConf C API and the Bonobo-based API on an
app-by-app basis.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Miért olyan hosszú szó az, hogy rövidítés?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
  - From: Dietmar Maurer

References:
- Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
  - From: Dietmar Maurer

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]