[no subject]
<BR>
<A HREF="http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-10-20-002-20-OP-MS">http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-10-20-002-20-OP-MS</A>
<BR>
<BR>
On Sat, 2001-12-22 at 21:07, Seth Nickell wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> The Free Software Foundation is for total disclosure as soon as</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> possible.</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> Microsoft is for total secrety until the patch is released.</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> </FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> There are arguments on both sides of the story, and a search on the</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> Internet will give you all the arguments of both camps. However GNU , I</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> think, is for total disclosure as early as possible, so as the G in</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>> GNOME means GNU then the path is easy to follow.</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I></FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>Could you send us a link to this? I have never heard a stance by GNU or</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>the FSF on security hole disclosure...</FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I></FONT></FONT></I>
<FONT COLOR="#737373"><FONT SIZE="3"><I>-Seth</FONT></FONT></I>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--=-kWTHZET1GizTXBhoex49--
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]