Re: No LIBGNOMECANVAS_MODULE?
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: murrayc usa net
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, gnome-2-0 <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: No LIBGNOMECANVAS_MODULE?
- Date: 12 Dec 2001 11:27:01 -0500
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 06:09, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 07:21, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >
> > Hi Murray,
> >
> > On 11 Dec 2001, jacob berkman wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 09:10, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > I can't find a ModuleInfo for libgnomecanvas, for use with
> > > > gnome_program_init(), anywhere, and the libgnomecanvas demo doesn't
> > use
> > > > it. Is it really not needed?
> > >
> > > the canvas doesn't need to initialize anything. well, except gtk...
> > > and it doesn't even link against libgnome, so there is no reason to
> > > have thie ModuleInfo crap in there.
> >
> > I think the gnome-program stuff could suddenly become quite useful
> > for accessibility. Either way, if you need the module Murray - we should
> > put it in libgnomeui - since libgnomecanvas doesn't depend on libgnome at
> > all - which is nice.
>
> I don't need it. I just wanted to make sure that it didn't exist,
> because the ChangeLog mentions it a few times. I wouldn't like the idea
> of it being in libgnomeui if it's needed by users of libgnomecanvas.
> That would just be like making libgnomecanvas depend on libgnomeui
> instead of libgnome.
yes well gnome-vfs, gconf, gtk, etc. etc. all have ModuleInfos provided
by libgnome(ui). but i'd rather it stop there if at all possible.
jacob
--
"In fact, can you imagine anything more terrifying than a zombie clown?"
-- moby
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]