Re: gnome-recent, ready to rock

[Michael Meeks <michael peabody ximian com>]

On 6 Dec 2001, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > Please excuse my ignorance.  libgal isn't considered to contain part
> > of the core Gnome 2.0 API and is thus allowed to continue to be in
> > flux?
>
> yeah, and hasn't been ported yet to GNOME 2 AFAIK.

        See the 'gal2' branch of gal. It needs stable's changes pulling in
intelligently, I've had no real time to work on it recently.

        Oh - and it's totaly inappropriate to suggest adding a 'recent'
type API to libgnomeui at this point; absolutely out of the question. The
API needs careful design, use, revision and stabilization. Gal seems a
good place for it if at all, and prolly best to start with the gnumeric
code I think.

        Regards,

                Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot