Re: libgnome* status

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

Alex Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Sander Vesik wrote:
>
>
> > On 31 Aug 2001, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I missed this in my initial response:
> > >
> > > Anders Carlsson <andersca gnu org> writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Stuff that needs doing:
> > > > -----------------------
> > > >
> > > > *  finish gnomedruid stuff, includes API changes (jrb)
> > > >   (not a requirement for 2.0, but a would-be-nice)
> > > Also:
> > >   * not puntable; GnomeDruidPage{Start,Finish} compat #defines, deprecated
> > >
> > >
> > > > *  bring back gnome-score (non-deprecated)
> > > I could be convinced to move this into gnome-games.  Anyone else have
> > > opinions?
> > Where to in gnome-games? Having all games link against an additional
> > one-function lib would be positivly evil.
>
> Static library.
>
> / Alex

The only problem is that if somebody finds a bug (a security related bug 
for example) in the score API, you would have to recompile every single 
game. Really, putting that in libgnome makes sense.

Cheers