Re: libglade-1.99.1

On 24 Aug 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
> > 	While libglade clearly has value outside the GNOME platform - I
> > think it would be by far the best if the default build was the GNOME
> > build, and that the default GNOME build relied on all the funky
> > technologies we have.
> >
> > 	This will stop all the whacked out package builders in various
> > distros from getting it wrong - and yet still allow people to have gtk
> > only builds.
> >
> > 	How does that sound James ?
> >
> How is this different from building the Bonobo module if bonoboui is
> found, and not otherwise?

i think meeks meant that it requires bonobo unless you pass a
--disable-bonobo flag.  (which i would think is a good idea)

In the afterlife, a cute .signature will only get you so far.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]