Re: gal is missing

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Karl Eichwalder <keichwa gmx net> writes:

> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> 
> > On 18 Feb 2001 10:06:46 +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> > > Neither package-list nor package-list-extras seems to feature 'gal'.
> > 
> > gal isn't included in gnome 1.4.
> 
> Intentionally?  Gnumeric needs it and Gnumeric is listed in
> package-list-extras.  We's to add 'gal', too.
> 

You are right, this probably means we should add `gal' to the extra
apps distribution.

 - Maciej