Re: GNOME Releng web site
- From: Julian Missig <julian linuxpower org>
- To: Dan Mueth <d-mueth uchicago edu>
- Cc: Pat Eyler <pate gnu org>, gnome-1 4-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Releng web site
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 16:03:37 -0400
Dan Mueth wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Pat Eyler wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > gnomoku - rough consensus against - we don't want to add too many
> > > games to the GNOME distribution
> >
> > perhaps there should be a minimal set of games in GNOME 1.4, and an
> > optional 'games pack', somewhat along the lines of GNOME Office. A
> > unified release of this paock could be done every quarter or semester.
> > Another option would be just to let distributors handle games (see my
> > comment on gabber below).
>
> This is an interesting idea. Right now, we pretty much have:
> 1) Official GNOME packages
> 2) A few "blessed" packages which Helix ships but aren't "official"
> 3) Random applications
>
> I like the idea of gathering applications together which fill in the
> second tier (2) above. They could be things like gnome-games-extra,
> gnome-applets-extra, etc. The advantage is that users who want to get a
> package of games, applets, or whatever which have passed a certain level
> of stability and cool-ness can do so easily. This would also encourage
> developers of independent GNOME apps to work a bit harder to get their
> apps into the "extra" pages, get them documented and translated, etc.
>
> It also gives us some extra flexibility with what is the official, main
> GNOME distribution and what are add-ons.
>
> Dan
>
I would just like to say that I agree, it would be nice to have "GNOME"
and then have "GNOME Office" and "GNOME Games" and "Extra GNOME Applets"
and such.
Julian
--
email: julian linuxpower org
jabber:julian jabber org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]