Yes.
> Is there a reason why you're not using GConn instead? GConn is much more
> convenient to use for asynchronous TCP connections.
I tried GConn first. And like everything else it worked on Linux.
But with the same code on win32 I could only recive lines, not send
lines back to the server. Probably some mistake from my side. Maybe I'll
go back to my first GConn attempt and investigate what was wrong (now that
I have become one with gnet ;)
/Albert