[Fwd: RE: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?]

This decides it for me.


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: RE: [gtkmm] Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
Datum: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:20:53 +0200
Von: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
An: <christof petig-baender de>

Hmmm. Agreed. Hmmm. But ...

Is it suitable enough to be used as a pointer to Gtk::Widgets? E.g. to make a ctor exception safe (destructing all already generated widgets) and destructing (non managed) member widgets in the dtor?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]