[glade--]Re: RE : [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela <e98cuenc free fr>
- To: murrayc usa net
- Cc: 'Gnome Hackers' <gnome-hackers gnome org>, glade-devel ximian com, glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: [glade--]Re: RE : [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- Date: 08 Mar 2003 17:28:11 +0100
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 15:01, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 15:26, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote:
> > Murray wrote:
> > >
> > > > but in fact, you can't do much better if you generate code.
> > >
> > > C++ has the concept of inheritance. glademm generates only
> > > base classes.
> > > User-written code is in user-written derived classes.
> >
> > That's irrelevant. The question is: what happens when the user edits
> > code that he shouldn't edit and later it regenerates this code?
>
> He shouldn't. He doesn't have any need to.
In the same sense that when you do a singleton the user should use a
::getInstance method, but you still make the constructors private. Just
to be sure.
There is an important difference between "he shouldn't" and "he can't".
Cheers,
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]