RE: [glade--]how to install glademm on RHL9
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: vgrinche integ com, susumu yt com
- Cc: glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [glade--]how to install glademm on RHL9
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:03:18 +0100
1. I don't see the -devel rpm there.
2. Where did you get this libsigc++ rpm? It doesn't look like a fedora.us
murrayc usa net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: glademm-list-admin gnome org
> [mailto:glademm-list-admin gnome org] On Behalf Of Vladislav
> Sent: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2003 17:58
> To: susumu yt com
> Cc: glademm-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: [glade--]how to install glademm on RHL9
> I user both rh9 and fedora.
> % rpm -qi libsigc++
> Name : libsigc++ Relocations: /usr
> Version : 1.2.2 Vendor: Karl E.
> Nelson <kenelson ece ucdavis edu>
> Release : 1 Build Date: Tue 22
> Apr 2003 03:15:20 PM EDT
> Install Date: Thu 24 Apr 2003 Build Host:
> Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM:
> Size : 134498 License: LGPL
> Signature : (none)
> Packager :
> URL : http://libsigc.sourceforge.net/
> Summary : The Typesafe Signal Framework for C++
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:43:48PM +0100, Christof Petig wrote:
> > Susumu Yoshida schrieb:
> > >Thank for your reply again.
> > >I am really sorry that I annoy you with an unfamiliar distribution.
> > Not that annoying to be sure.
> > >>If your linux distribution cannot give you automatic dependancy
> > >>resolution (which I clearly doubt, given that RH/fedora still has
> > >>users), you should consider a decent distribution.
> Perhaps apt-rpm is
> > >>the correct solution for you.
> > >
> > >
> > >According to you, I installed apt-rpm and tried again but failed.
> > Oh, you did not fail. It gave you a decent error message:
> > >nana:/home/susumu/SRC# apt-get install libsigc++-devel Reading
> > >Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > >libsigc++-devel is already the newest version.
> > Perhaps this is libsigc++-1.0 which is the old one for gtkmm1. This
> > used
> > to be called libsigc++ (without a version number). Or ... I heard
> > _rumors_ that redhat/fedora had made some debatable
> decisions to give
> > incompatible packages the same (but shorter) name. Perhaps
> sigc++ 1.2 is
> > called libsigc++, too and you got the wrong one.
> > >nana:/home/susumu/SRC# apt-get install gtkmm2
> > >Reading Package Lists... Done
> > >Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > >Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > >requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > >distribution that some required packages have not yet been
> created or
> > >been moved out of Incoming.
> > >
> > >Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely
> > >that the package is simply not installable and a bug
> report against
> > >that package should be filed. The following information
> may help to
> > >resolve the situation:
> > >
> > >The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > gtkmm2: Depends: libsigc-1.2.so.5
> > >E: Broken packages
> > >See? The newest version of both libsigc++ and libsigc++-devel are
> > >already installed on my machine but when I try to "apt-get install
> > >gtkmm2", it says "libsigc-1.2 is UNMET". Does it make sense?
> > Yes. Somewhat. It looks like you mixed packages from different
> > incompatible sources. Or apt-rpm can not live to its
> expectations ;-)
> > >
> > >You say
> > >
> > >
> > >>Shocked and glad to not _had_ to compile gtkmm myself for several
> > >>years
> > >
> > >
> > >but is it much easier to use gtkmm on Debian (which is
> > > your distribution,right?) ?
> > Debian is my distribution and while it has different issues
> > transitions take a long time which is mostly due to
> decisions of the
> > people involved or lack of maintainer's spare time) I grew
> really fond
> > of its package management.
> > The gnome 2.4 situation in sid (unstable) is really good. Sarge
> > (testing) is slowly getting there and woody (stable) is
> hopelessly frozen.
> > But fedora should not be a bad choice either (from what I
> have heard).
> > Christof
> > _______________________________________________
> > glademm-list mailing list
> > glademm-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glademm-list
> Vladislav Grinchenko e-mail (w): vgrinche integ com
> Software Engineer (h): 3rdshift comcast net
> Integral Systems, Inc.
> Focus on quality, and productivity will follow.
> glademm-list mailing list
> glademm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/glad> emm-list
] [Thread Prev