Re: [[glade--]Re: glademm2]

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de> wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de> wrote:
> > 
> >>Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>
> >>Did you mean 'Is gtk 2.0 compatible with glademm?'
> >>
> >>The answer:
> >>
> >>Both coexist (!) peacefully (and no more, you still need gtk 1.2).
> >>
> >>glademm is not yet compatible with glade-2 (which uses gtk+2.0) (first 
> >>on my TODO list)
> > 
> > 
> > In case itīs any incentive, when glademm2 appears I will be giving it
much
> > more attention. Iīm not convinced that code-generation is all that useful
for
> > development, but it seems like a great way to have a kind of interactive
> > tutorial.
> 
> It will never appear ;-)
> 
> the next glademm version will handle gracefully both glade and glade-2 
> files and emit gtkmm 1.2 or gtkmm 1.3 code depending on the version 
> present (or the command line parameter given)
> 
> Do you think of this as bad idea? The overhead for supporting both file 
> types is neglectable.
> [Of course glademm2 _sounds_ so new and polished.]
>    Christof

If itīs easy then support both. But I donīt think anybody would mind if you
just support gtkmm2 and glade2. Itīs probably less work for you. And less
options means less silly bug reports.


Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com