Re: [gdome] Future development of gdome



Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org> writes:

>  I would happily remove them if not needed. Also tell me if something
> else is specifically needed for DOM operation. I understand that
> having a pointer to an application (be it DOM or other) datatype
> may still be useful. Feedback on those issues is needed,

>From what I have seen in Gill, there is need for an application data pointer
in the EventListener's callback which needs a way to get data specific to the
EventListener/EventTarget it is being called upon.

see the gdome_xml_evntl_get_priv function from gdome which I just created.

Mathieu




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]