Re: GDM branched for GNOME 2.0 (GDM 2.4)



On 7 Nov 2001, Carlos [ISO-8859-1] Perell?Mar璯 wrote:

> > > Carlos> Then, gdm3 is dead?
> > >
> > > Was it ever alive*?
> >
> > So, why does it exist a gdm3 in the unstable status report?
>
> Because I didn't know that is dead. The new ones don't have it but gdm2.
> Sorry.

And is it ok to declare so by adding "THIS_MODULE_IS_X" to gdm3
repository?

Abel



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]