Re: INVALID vs. NULL values
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Frederic Gobry <frederic gobry smartdata ch>
- Cc: gconf-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: INVALID vs. NULL values
- Date: 11 Mar 2002 15:12:29 -0500
Frederic Gobry <frederic gobry smartdata ch> writes:
> > Here comes my question: what is the difference between a GConfValue
> > value of type INVALID, or a NULL GConfValue ? (so that I can keep the
> > same semantic in my own code)
>
> Ooop, obviously I didn't try to instantiate a GConfValue of type
> INVALID... Sorry !
>
Yeah I don't think INVALID is actually used for GConfValues.
BTW, I'd be interested in seeing the code for your stripped-down
version. It probably isn't that appropriate for desktop use but I have
been investigating some improvements along the lines of changing the
protocol.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]