Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: 15 Jun 2001 23:36:41 +0100
Hi,
I'm switching to very angry mode, and removing every swear word than
comes up to my mind.
On 16 Jun 2001 00:11:24 +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Sander Vesik wrote:
>
> > Well, lets go back to some well know ground.
> >
> > Dietmar:
> > * to the best of your knowledge, how many people were aware of
> > 'bonobo-config, the brand new configuration system for gnome'
> > before this thread?
>
> Many. I have already made two announcements on the gnome lists. We also had an
> extensive discussion on the gconf list (half a year ago). Most people at Ximian
> are aware of the project, and I have even talked to peoples at Sun ;-)
So is that it ? People at Ximian and Sun knew about it, and then the
whole Gnome community knows about it ?
I'm an application developer, I've been to GUADEC, been nearly every day
on the gnome irc channel for the last 8 months, read Gnotices every day,
am on the Gnome2 and the gnome-devel mailing list, and I never heard of
bonobo-conf(ig).
Am I supposed to work at Ximian or Sun to know what my applications are
going to use to read their configuration ?
> > * Why do we want it anyways?
>
> unified interface for property values, code cleanup, code reuse, CORBA interface,
> scriptable, CORBA_any, ...
>
> > General questions:
> > * porting - how much additional porting will using bonbo-config
> > instead of gconf introduce?
>
> We can even provide fully compatible function.
>
> > * more importantly - why would one go to the effort?
>
> see above.
>
> > * how much overhead does it add?
>
> none
>
> > * API freeze/code freeze/documenetation timeline?
>
> no problem if we work together.
>
> > * what happens to interoperability in a scenario where not all
> > applications port to bonobo-config and bonbo-config is switched
> > to use some other backend?
> > * if the above won't happen then why?
> >
> > It sure does look like a whole big subsystem is just being sneaked in
> > through the back door.
> >
>
> You missed some previous discussions.
Seems like I did as well.
Blow, I'm pissed off.
--
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]