Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- Cc: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:30:18 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Sander,
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Sander Vesik wrote:
> This is good to know. I'll assume if I and Havoc decide to move Bonobo
> to live on top of something else than corba we'd just talk to people
> at redhat and Sun (and maybe say Mandrake) post a couple of
> annonucements of the existence of say bonobo-xyz and then just switch
> it to being the default????
I'll assume if you have argued for months that CORBA is bad in a
public forum, remonstrated with the authors, discovered that they had no
intention of integrating their work nicely with the platform. Then I would
expect to see an alternative implementation to CORBA, if it was in fact
not all talk and no action.
Especialy if the people doing the re-write had put a lot of actual
hacking work into Gnome 2.0.
Warmest regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]