Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Sander Vesik wrote:
> 
> > Users frequently don't want this. Administrartor frequently do want this
> > or even won't / can't look at things that don't provide this.
> > 
> > Not providing this isn't *really* an option.
> 
> But this might give a false sense of security -- when in fact, you can
> always recompile your applications  not to use the defaults forced by the
> system.
> 

It's not intended to be secure, just keep typical users from screwing
themselves up.

Havoc