Re: entries or pairs ? messages patch

[hp redhat com]

From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
Date: 27 Jul 2001 23:44:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: Yanko Kaneti's message of "28 Jul 2001 05:10:05 +0300"
Message-ID: <y5wk80t7m66 fsf icon labs redhat com>
Lines: 18
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Yanko Kaneti <yaneti declera com> writes:
> 
> met a small inconsistency in gconftool, "--all-pairs" in messages where
> the appropriate flag is --all-entries
> 
> attached is a patch to fix those, but i guess there is more to it as
> pairs and entires are equaly distributed (as strings and identifiers)
> all over the place.
> 

They used to be called pairs, I renamed them entries, but wasn't
thorough enough about it.

Your patch looks fine, if you have commit access feel free to check it
in (with ChangeLog entry).

Havoc