Re: GConf and bonobo-conf

[Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>]

> (In the above case, I'd also be strongly in favour of renaming the EMail
> field when you reassign the meaning of its contents; the old field, if
> its values are no longer meaningful, can be safely ignored.)

Yes, that is exactly the point: if you change the meaning, the
content, or any other part of the contract, then you have to use a new
key, and provide a migration mechanism.