Re: const
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>
- Cc: gconf-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: const
- Date: 15 Apr 2001 12:33:40 -0400
Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net> writes:
> I think that some GConf functions need to make use of const.
> e.g.
> gconf_value_copy(), gconf_schema_copy(), gconf_value_to_string().
>
> Would this break binary compatibility? Will you be breaking binary and/or
> source compatibility for GNOME 2?
>
It can be done in unstable.
However it's not that useful (const does not work properly for C
structs, which is why C programmers rarely bother to use const).
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]