Re: screem & gnome-menus-2.11.x

["Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D." <joseph_sacco comcast net>]

Good idea...  I don't subscribe to those lists.  If you do, feel free to
pass it on

-Joseph

=====================================================================
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:13 +0200, guenther wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 18:50 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
> > As reported last week, screem-0.14.1 does not compile because it was
> > written for gnome-menus-2.10.x. The dependency on gnome-menus-2.10.x is
> > isolated to a single file:
> > 
> > 	./src/screem-apps-model.c
> > 
> > screem CVS [anonymous login]
> > 
> > 	:pserver:anonymous cvs sourceforge net:/cvsroot/screem
> > 
> > contains a development branch, screem-dev, which is a work-in-progress
> > version of screem-0.15. This version builds, installs and runs with
> > *either* gnome-menus-2.10.x or gnome-menus-2.11.x.
> > 
> > >From the Changelog:
> > 
> >         2005-05-29 David A Knight  <david ritter demon co uk>
> >         
> >                 * screem-apps-model.c:  support 2.10.x versions of
> >                                 libgnome-menu as well as newer versions
> > 
> > David Knight's work on screem-apps-model.c is worth studying. A
> > comparison of the CVS version of screem-apps-model.c with the version
> > from screem-0.14.1 shows a way to port other applications to support
> > both gnome-menus-2.10.x and gnome-menus-2.11.x
> 
> Good catch. :)
> 
> To poke the hackers about this, a note like the one above posted to
> gnome-list, gnome-love and maybe d-d-l and other liste would be
> appropriate. What do you think?
> 
> The safest approach would be to hunt down all apps that have issues with
> this and file bug reports against them. Would be a lot more work
> though...
> 
> ...guenther
> 
> 
-- 
joseph_sacco [at] comcast [dot] net