[Bug 99741] Changed - gnome-session won't start it dies after splash screen
- From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
- To: dsavard cids ca, garnome-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: [Bug 99741] Changed - gnome-session won't start it dies after splash screen
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:58:53 -0500 (EST)
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99741
Changed by jdub perkypants org
--- shadow/99741 Thu Nov 28 22:49:21 2002
+++ shadow/99741.tmp.6277 Thu Nov 28 22:58:53 2002
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
Bug#: 99741
Product: GARNOME
Version: unspecified
OS: Linux
OS Details:
-Status: RESOLVED
+Status: CLOSED
Resolution: WONTFIX
Severity: critical
Priority: Normal
Component: general
AssignedTo: jdub perkypants org
ReportedBy: dsavard cids ca
@@ -195,6 +195,23 @@
with something about the fontserver, however, the fontserver is
useless with Gnome 2 and the fontconfig doc is not complete or there
is no way to be sure what is says is what you get. fc-list command
tells me the fonts are there and gnome-session is telling me they are not.
Why not simply include the fonts and the working setup with GARNOME?
+
+------- Additional Comments From jdub perkypants org 2002-11-28 22:58 -------
+a) GARNOME 0.18.x builds GNOME 2.1.x, which uses fontconfig and Xft2,
+not core X fonts. It's a whole different kettle of fish. That's why
+I've recommended using stable, as you seem to want to USE not TEST the
+software.
+
+b) GARNOME does not include fonts because... Well, why should it? This
+is for testing GNOME, not distributing fonts. You have fonts. I have
+fonts. Everyone already has fonts.
+
+c) GARNOME *is* a working setup for most users. If you don't have the
+time to test and debug unstable development software, use GARNOME
+0.17.x, or do the sensible thing and use packages for your distribution.
+
+If you want to discuss this further, post to the GARNOME mailing list.
+This is totally inane to discuss in bugzilla, so I'm closing the bug.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]