Re: [gamin] State of python unit tests?



On 1/10/06, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:27:15AM -0500, William Lachance wrote:
> > On 1/10/06, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:

>   You mean the inotify back-end broke the tests and this was never fixed
> then yes. Grab a dnotify based kernel they pass. There was a discussion about
> this with John back at the end of last summer about this.

Ok, this makes a great deal more sense now. I agree that it's probably
better to get the unit tests passing 100% before potentially
destabilizing things further.

--
William Lachance
wrlach gmail com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]