Re: [Off Topic] Words to Avoid "Vendor" [was Re: Questions to answer]
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad cs toronto edu>
- To: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Off Topic] Words to Avoid "Vendor" [was Re: Questions to answer]
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 03:00:58 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > Does "ISV" stand for "Independent Software Vendor"? If so, the term is
> > often misleading, because the most important developers of GNOME
> > applications--those developing free software--are mostly not vendors.
>
> The important point is the need for clear documentation making it easier
> for those who want to work with Gnome including businesses which self
> identify under the term ISV. I'm sure the intention was not to exclude
> anyone.
And as an individual, I think that choice of word did fail.
Whenever I saw/read ISV in any context in GNOME, I thought of it
as issues concerning businesses only, not myself as a *user* of
the GNOME libraries, etc. I'm sure I'm not the only one. So the
concern is real IMO.
behdad
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]