Re: GUADEC registration fee
- From: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org, guadec-planning gnome irg
- Subject: Re: GUADEC registration fee
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:14:45 +0100
On Llu, 2004-04-19 at 19:15, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 3) It sounds like the real problem here is that there is not enough
> corporate sponsorship of the conference. Is the best solution
> really to use attendees as cannon fodder in this struggle?
It seems the standard approach - sponsorship by those who go as opposed
to by those who don't. Also common is "sponsors get 'n' free entrants,
which is sort of a mix and match.
> 4) Is the money being used to "make it a better conference" or "bring
> more people to the conference"? I think the former has to be the
> prime goal (at least, "more relevant people"). If the large
> registration fee is ear-marked to make the conference better and is
> meanwhile causing less people to be able to attend ...
Or is it to break even 8)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]