Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure
- From: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Enhancement Procedure
- Date: 18 Jun 2001 22:45:21 -0400
> More as they come to me. :)
The only thing that concerns me about the whole process is how things
that do not fall completely within the GNOME project will work with it.
GConf and GTK+ are examples that I can think of offhand.
Using GTK+ as an example, if the GObject or ATK stuff were being done
after this were in place, would they have to submit to this process as
well as the normal GTK+ process? (Which is usually a proposal to the
list, some discussion, and approval from Havoc, Owen and/or Tim)
If they wanted to put GnomeCanvas (or some other large scale widget, or
gdk-pixbuf, or whatever) in GTK, do they have to follow the process?
What if it gets turned down, despite arguing that it might be of benefit
to more people? I doubt we would end up forking GTK, but how would we
] [Thread Prev