Minutes of the special GNOME-2.0 Board meeting
- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard imag fr>
- To: foundation-list gnome org, gnome-hacker gnome org
- Cc: foundation-announce gnome org
- Subject: Minutes of the special GNOME-2.0 Board meeting
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:32:41 +0100
[Please reply to gnome-hacker gnome org get the discussion focused on the
right channel, thanks ...]
Minutes of the special GNOME-2.0 Board meeting
==============================================
13 February 2001
================
Presents:
=========
Havoc Pennington (chairing)
Raph Levien
Owen Taylor
John Heard
Daniel Veillard (minutes)
Dan Mueth
Bart Decrem
Missing:
========
Maciej Stachowiak
Regrets:
========
Jim Gettys
Federico
Miguel de Icaza
Decisions:
==========
- None, this meeting was not a decision making process, hence no
decision, no action items, an not really an agenda.
- The people present at the meeting freely discussed GNOME-2.0
Of interest is the point that most of us agreed without initial
discussion on the main goals and target of what should be GNOME-2.0
- The next step will be to get an ongoing discussion in gnome-hackers
Discussion:
===========
- Gnome-1.4 Platform
- list of platforms
- primary contact per platform
would be great to have Company/Emails
- GNOME 2.0
- Miguel though missing sent a pointer to his notes on the subject
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/gnome-2.0
- Bart:
+ be sure to have a date and the roadmap: 2.0 should be in 2001
ISV/companies/ distributor need them
+ Balance between need for coordinations vs. this is an open process
+ end of guadec have things planned
- Dan:
+ aggressive schedule
+ more user visible changes (multimedia, sound, gnome office)
+ consistence in the application
- Daniel:
+ new release in 2001
+ lot of new core libraries, we need to work on planning this maybe
before GUADEC
- Havoc:
+ release early is important for users
+ process improvement, bugzilla
+ need user visible changes, may not have much time to improve gnome-lib
some of the API breakage may have to be rolled-back
+ we need to focuse on the core of the desktop, this will lower
the release pressure
- John:
+ process
- need an API strategy, including API freeze
+ schedule
- need Gnome 2 in 2001
+ features
- need accessibility, early work should be public soon
- Gtk2 is needed
- Bonobo in some official stabilized version
- libxml2
- documentation, localization need to be cleaned
- Java integration
+ gnome-office
- will be the user visible point
- Owen:
+ agree with rapid timeframe
+ Gnome 1 had the problem of hacking on the stable branch
we need to freeze the API
+ Moving to Gtk2 may be the main change, reusing the new libraries
from 1.4
+ we won't have much time on application
+ but we need a nice desktop, documentation, cleanless, the user
enviroment and session management must be slick
+ keep goals manageable and do it in time
- Raph:
+ concern is Bonobo, question is bonobo componentization and having
an API freeze quick is needed to have this one of the goal of 2.0.
Bonobo is on a critical path
+ otherwise agrees with other.
=> it seems that most of the people agree on this very high level
point of view.
Process wise we started dicussing what could be done:
- mozilla bug tracking
- set milestones add them to the tracking system
- how do we make decision on API freeze
- The Board won't mandate but should suggest, and take the initiative
to make proposal.
- gnome-libs is too big and would gain being broken down
- modularity is really important, keep packages of an human manageable
size
- having a review process for APIs in the future
We will initiate discussion on gnome-hacker real soon,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]