Re: Minutes of the GNOME Foundation Board meeting 28 November 2000

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

rms39 columbia edu (Russell Steinthal) writes: 
> That may be, but I think part of the confusion is that the desire for 
> ACL's is a distinct issue from the reliability of the hardware setup. 
> >From the minutes above, it appears that the access issue was somehow 
> related to the issue of downtime.  As far as I can tell, there is no 
> relationship between the two, other than that both would 
> theoretically be eliminated by moving to Sourceforge.  (Or one or 
> both could be made worse.)

The relationship was exactly that, we were talking about whether to
replace the gnome.org software with the Sourceforge software (separate
issue of where the machines are physically located and who admins
them). One reason Miguel wanted the Sourceforge software was ACLs.
However a number of problems with using that software were also
brought up.

Havoc